fix broken link

diff --git a/blog/2016-08-25-site-redesign.md b/blog/2016-08-25-site-redesign.md
index 7e9452a50bba51d1486d96a29184becf5f21f426..110684a0e1dcbcfef7304a490e21b24b37faca67 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/2016-08-25-site-redesign.md
+++ b/blog/2016-08-25-site-redesign.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ title: "Site redesigned. Random thoughts"
 
 Please let me know what you think of the current site design. It's my own creation.
 
 
 Please let me know what you think of the current site design. It's my own creation.
 

-Disqus and it's ilk suck: it pushes tracking, advertising, and proprietary javascript on your users. The comments aren't saved by archive.org. People have lots more reasons they dislike it. NPR just deleted 2.8 billion Disqus comments. I didn't find any simple way to add self hosted comments, so I wrote my own. Later, I did find some [solutions](solutions), but I'm partial to my own.
+Disqus and it's ilk suck: it pushes tracking, advertising, and proprietary javascript on your users. The comments aren't saved by archive.org. People have lots more reasons they dislike it. NPR just deleted 2.8 billion Disqus comments. I didn't find any simple way to add self hosted comments, so I wrote my own. Later, I did find some [solutions](https://posativ.org/isso/docs/), but I'm partial to my own.

 
 I originally used Jekyll (the most popular static site generator), but I ditched it and made my own site generator. It's only complex enough for my own needs, and It was fun. One nice thing is I'm much faster than Jekyll, so I can handle page regen on comment submission without performance worries. I regen a page in 120ms, compared to jekyll at 430 ms, and I have no idea if that would grow when the site grew etc.
 
 
 I originally used Jekyll (the most popular static site generator), but I ditched it and made my own site generator. It's only complex enough for my own needs, and It was fun. One nice thing is I'm much faster than Jekyll, so I can handle page regen on comment submission without performance worries. I regen a page in 120ms, compared to jekyll at 430 ms, and I have no idea if that would grow when the site grew etc.