fix misspellings

diff --git a/README b/README
index 4aa8f6e5fb17e4d83f20750c2817665e33a960a8..594e9dced31b36220b9535f5b2ef7d9960fbaea0 100644 (file)
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -43,12 +43,13 @@ comments. With one emacs command, you get a buffer of the new comments,
 with keybinds to mark them for publishing, moderatation, banning, and
 execute changes.
 
 with keybinds to mark them for publishing, moderatation, banning, and
 execute changes.
 

-* Inspirations
+* Other sites that are in some way interesting:

 
 http://blog.zorinaq.com/release-of-hablog-and-new-design/?
 https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/
 http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com
 https://eduardoboucas.com/blog/2015/05/11/rethinking-the-commenting-system-for-my-jekyll-site.html
 
 http://blog.zorinaq.com/release-of-hablog-and-new-design/?
 https://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/
 http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com
 https://eduardoboucas.com/blog/2015/05/11/rethinking-the-commenting-system-for-my-jekyll-site.html

+https://chris-lamb.co.uk/posts/concorde

 
 * License
 
 
 * License
 

diff --git a/blog/2014-08-01-publishing-my-technical-notes.md b/blog/2014-08-01-publishing-my-technical-notes.md
index bcb1a8b39ef6ff8a4f0c33a26ffdc160b552118d..7733f3c65a3e1a0cb5d3e9dfab61f8e614e3764e 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/2014-08-01-publishing-my-technical-notes.md
+++ b/blog/2014-08-01-publishing-my-technical-notes.md
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ so there are a lot of existing sites and sources I am going to be offloading to
 
 But I also have a vision of a site for material which doesn't fit well
 in existing sources, about any free software, and has some
 
 But I also have a vision of a site for material which doesn't fit well
 in existing sources, about any free software, and has some

-opionionatedness / style that official documentation does not generally
+opinionatedness / style that official documentation does not generally

 afford. One very common and annoying practice of people who do good
 writing on technical topics is to use a blog or site which doesn't
 invite collaboration and improvement by others. So... I've started
 afford. One very common and annoying practice of people who do good
 writing on technical topics is to use a blog or site which doesn't
 invite collaboration and improvement by others. So... I've started

diff --git a/blog/2014-08-07-python-uninstall.md b/blog/2014-08-07-python-uninstall.md
index 53db8e60154bfb52866307055947866a5240edc2..8564c2ba06267298f9fe3040ffd4828d830bbe30 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/2014-08-07-python-uninstall.md
+++ b/blog/2014-08-07-python-uninstall.md
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ comment_links:
 
 `setup.py install` is the base standard install method for Python projects. I found myself wanting to uninstall one of these projects the other day. Turns out it doesn't support uninstall, but Google's top result is a Stackoverflow answer with ~250 votes that says [it can be done no problem](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1550226/python-setup-py-uninstall).
 
 
 `setup.py install` is the base standard install method for Python projects. I found myself wanting to uninstall one of these projects the other day. Turns out it doesn't support uninstall, but Google's top result is a Stackoverflow answer with ~250 votes that says [it can be done no problem](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1550226/python-setup-py-uninstall).
 

-What it doesn't say is that it will silently fail / delete the wrong files when filenames have spaces, along with other important limitations. I looked around at all the other answers and links from google and there was no better answer. How does this happen for a widely used package inluded in Python for at least [15 years](http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/61c91c7f101b/Lib/distutils)?
+What it doesn't say is that it will silently fail / delete the wrong files when filenames have spaces, along with other important limitations. I looked around at all the other answers and links from google and there was no better answer. How does this happen for a widely used package included in Python for at least [15 years](http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/61c91c7f101b/Lib/distutils)?

 
 It’s pretty standard fair: uninstall has spotty support across a great many installation technologies. I won't try to draw some broad conclusion.
 
 
 It’s pretty standard fair: uninstall has spotty support across a great many installation technologies. I won't try to draw some broad conclusion.
 

diff --git a/blog/2014-09-29-say-on2.md b/blog/2014-09-29-say-on2.md
index 34b769c4dd3d5e5b877a94e3a7e44454af988e92..10b21198e60bf88a7fe1f0c58ea81f8221a53f3d 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/2014-09-29-say-on2.md
+++ b/blog/2014-09-29-say-on2.md
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ On2 = bnf_expand([O, of, ["n squared"]], [['quadratic'], O],
 print On2
 ~~~
 
 print On2
 ~~~
 

-The result is 92 terms which can work the same in a conversation (unless your votes/comments say otherwise). And that doesn't even consider whether to say someting _is_ O(n²), _has_ O(n²), or _is of_ O(n²).
+The result is 92 terms which can work the same in a conversation (unless your votes/comments say otherwise). And that doesn't even consider whether to say something _is_ O(n²), _has_ O(n²), or _is of_ O(n²).

 
 The list is a bit long, so I put them in javascript and made some buttons.
 
 
 The list is a bit long, so I put them in javascript and made some buttons.
 

diff --git a/blog/2014-10-14-on2-vote-results.md b/blog/2014-10-14-on2-vote-results.md
index 0d44d6f852d7fc8db540a72f7cf3df1d434d8e52..09a0e5706969013ec23f4cee0f3b17705d8f2309 100644 (file)
--- a/blog/2014-10-14-on2-vote-results.md
+++ b/blog/2014-10-14-on2-vote-results.md
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Removal of "of" was slightly less popular (except for "order" which was basicall
 
 As I noted, opinions were split, with ~55% "sounds good", ~25% "sounds ok", and ~20% "sounds wrong or confusing" for each. For people who liked one of these four, they also had a preference for its minor variations, but felt average for the other three.
 
 
 As I noted, opinions were split, with ~55% "sounds good", ~25% "sounds ok", and ~20% "sounds wrong or confusing" for each. For people who liked one of these four, they also had a preference for its minor variations, but felt average for the other three.
 

-"big oh of n squared" did have an edge, which I think is at least partially due to the fact that I used O(n²) when writting about the topic. In a proper experiment, I would have interviewed people verbally and used a random term to introduce the topic.
+"big oh of n squared" did have an edge, which I think is at least partially due to the fact that I used O(n²) when writing about the topic. In a proper experiment, I would have interviewed people verbally and used a random term to introduce the topic.

 
 There weren't any words that stood out as universally disliked, although a few awkward combinations rounded the bottom with 60% "sounds wrong or confusing." I would recommend using one of the above, or a variation, which is still about 20 options.
 
 
 There weren't any words that stood out as universally disliked, although a few awkward combinations rounded the bottom with 60% "sounds wrong or confusing." I would recommend using one of the above, or a variation, which is still about 20 options.