- Bentley Hensel was unable to respond within the surprise 47-hour
deadline.
-- Richard Fontana and Bradley Kuhn had publicly raised concerns about a
- clause in the agreement that could restrict their speech
- indefinitely. They planned to seek clarification before signing. Confronted with a the new deadline, they proposed amendments,
- which OSI does not appear to have considered.
-
- [*LWN* covers many more details of the OSI election](https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1014603/ac0cfc0a74755501/)
-and within its conclusion notes:
+- Richard Fontana and Bradley Kuhn's [election
+ platform](https://codeberg.org/OSI-Reform-Platform/platform) was
+ critical of a clause in the board member agreement and stated "We
+ insist that this provision be reformulated with less sweeping and more
+ conventional language [...]" They had hoped to communicate with the
+ OSI board about this issue if they won an election. Confronted with a
+ the new deadline, they proposed amendments, but got no response.
+
+ [*LWN*'s OSI election coverage](https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1014603/ac0cfc0a74755501/)
+has many additional important details which build up to this note:
> "A cynical person might conclude that the last-minute requirement
> to sign the agreement was to disqualify one or both because they would
> have won otherwise; and that the OSI leadership was unwilling to have