From 4e6b44f51633535bc5d5e185bfc9821fbc763edc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Kelling Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:20:28 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fix broken link --- blog/2014-10-14-on2-vote-results.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blog/2014-10-14-on2-vote-results.md b/blog/2014-10-14-on2-vote-results.md index f396e7b..0d44d6f 100644 --- a/blog/2014-10-14-on2-vote-results.md +++ b/blog/2014-10-14-on2-vote-results.md @@ -22,6 +22,6 @@ As I noted, opinions were split, with ~55% "sounds good", ~25% "sounds ok", and There weren't any words that stood out as universally disliked, although a few awkward combinations rounded the bottom with 60% "sounds wrong or confusing." I would recommend using one of the above, or a variation, which is still about 20 options. -That is the high level overview. If you want to see all the words and their vote percentages, they are [here](/on2/on2-vote-detailed-analysis.txt). +That is the high level overview. If you want to see all the words and their vote percentages, they are [here](/on2vote/on2-vote-detailed-analysis.txt). Natural language sure can complicate things. Looking at data can give us some insights though. I wonder how preferences will change in 5 or 10 years. -- 2.30.2