From 88c435c164f30e50b6b381ec668552a61ef2618f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wolftune Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 06:00:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] typo fix, minor change --- petition.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/petition.md b/petition.md index 20d4013..0934d6b 100644 --- a/petition.md +++ b/petition.md @@ -41,13 +41,13 @@ the newly-adopted Open Source AI Definition (OSAID). They also advocated for revising the [OSI Board Member Agreement](https://opensource.org/board/board-member-agreement), because they interpreted the clause requiring members to "support publicly all Board -decisions" as being overlay expansive and stifling. They proposed clarifying or +decisions" as being overly expansive and stifling. They proposed clarifying or limiting the clause to achieve a better balance. Normally, as in prior years, as with other organizations, and as stated during candidate orientation, signing of the Board Agreement would happen only with the election winners as part of getting seated as new Directors. -Fontana and Kuhn stated their intentions to discuss in good faith their concerns +Fontana and Kuhn stated their good-faith intentions to bring up their concerns about the agreement if and when they won the election. Then, **about one hour after voting ended, OSI emailed a *new* requirement -- 2.30.2