From 0c04801a806d76db9d75004e2e8bf9f2f0f82521 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Kelling Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:42:09 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] add link to other comment solutions --- blog/2016-08-25-site-redesign.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/blog/2016-08-25-site-redesign.md b/blog/2016-08-25-site-redesign.md index 4265247..7e9452a 100644 --- a/blog/2016-08-25-site-redesign.md +++ b/blog/2016-08-25-site-redesign.md @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ title: "Site redesigned. Random thoughts" Please let me know what you think of the current site design. It's my own creation. -Disqus and it's ilk suck: it pushes tracking, advertising, and proprietary javascript on your users. The comments aren't saved by archive.org. People have lots more reasons they dislike it. NPR just deleted 2.8 billion Disqus comments. Unfortunately, there is no really simple way to add self hosted comments to your static blog, so I bit the bullet and wrote code for it. +Disqus and it's ilk suck: it pushes tracking, advertising, and proprietary javascript on your users. The comments aren't saved by archive.org. People have lots more reasons they dislike it. NPR just deleted 2.8 billion Disqus comments. I didn't find any simple way to add self hosted comments, so I wrote my own. Later, I did find some [solutions](solutions), but I'm partial to my own. -I originally used Jekyll (the most popular static site generator), but I ditched it and made my own site generator. It was fun. One nice thing is I'm much faster than Jekyll, so I can handle page regen on comment submission without performance worries. I regen a page in 120ms, compared to jekyll at 430 ms, and I have no idea if that would grow when the site grew etc. +I originally used Jekyll (the most popular static site generator), but I ditched it and made my own site generator. It's only complex enough for my own needs, and It was fun. One nice thing is I'm much faster than Jekyll, so I can handle page regen on comment submission without performance worries. I regen a page in 120ms, compared to jekyll at 430 ms, and I have no idea if that would grow when the site grew etc. Although I don't use much javascript (none on this page), I added javascript license data so the [librejs](https://www.gnu.org/software/librejs/) extension can detect that it is free software. It was pretty easy, and I recommend it. -- 2.30.2