From 0bcede4e1308113caee403536cb63d3407a87ab8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Kelling Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2025 03:27:31 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] improve accuracy --- petition.md | 17 ++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/petition.md b/petition.md index 0f8b07d..e680c9d 100644 --- a/petition.md +++ b/petition.md @@ -55,13 +55,16 @@ publication if any candidates failed to sign. - Bentley Hensel was unable to respond within the surprise 47-hour deadline. -- Richard Fontana and Bradley Kuhn had publicly raised concerns about a - clause in the agreement that could restrict their speech - indefinitely. They planned to seek clarification before signing. Confronted with a the new deadline, they proposed amendments, - which OSI does not appear to have considered. - - [*LWN* covers many more details of the OSI election](https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1014603/ac0cfc0a74755501/) -and within its conclusion notes: +- Richard Fontana and Bradley Kuhn's [election + platform](https://codeberg.org/OSI-Reform-Platform/platform) was + critical of a clause in the board member agreement and stated "We + insist that this provision be reformulated with less sweeping and more + conventional language [...]" They had hoped to communicate with the + OSI board about this issue if they won an election. Confronted with a + the new deadline, they proposed amendments, but got no response. + + [*LWN*'s OSI election coverage](https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/1014603/ac0cfc0a74755501/) +has many additional important details which build up to this note: > "A cynical person might conclude that the last-minute requirement > to sign the agreement was to disqualify one or both because they would > have won otherwise; and that the OSI leadership was unwilling to have -- 2.30.2